Judgment, Not Just Data
Ahrefs and Screaming Frog do the pulling; we do the reading — every gap assessed for whether it's actually winnable.
See exactly why they outrank you.
A systematic teardown of the sites beating you in search — content, backlinks, technical setup, and the keywords you're both missing — with a prioritized plan to close the gap, not just a report describing it.
Rankings are relative. It doesn't matter how good your SEO is in isolation — what matters is whether it's better than whoever currently holds the position you want. Most teams already sense that, which is why they run a competitor tool report at some point. Few actually act on it, because a raw export of a rival's top pages and referring domains doesn't tell you what to do next.
The useful version of this work isn't the data — it's the judgment on top of it: which gaps are closeable with the resources you actually have, which ones are a trap, and in what order to attack them so the wins compound instead of scattering effort across everything at once.
A content gap and a link gap on the same keyword cluster reinforce each other. Closing one without the other rarely moves the ranking.
Some advantages took a competitor a decade to build and aren't economical to chase. Knowing which ones saves you from a campaign that can't win.
The sites occupying your target SERPs are sometimes companies you'd never think to check against commercially.
Four reasons the analysis turns into action instead of sitting in a shared drive.
Ahrefs and Screaming Frog do the pulling; we do the reading — every gap assessed for whether it's actually winnable.
Gaps interact across all three. Analyzing them separately is how teams miss why a "content fix" never moved the ranking.
A ranked list of what to do first, second, and never — not a 40-page document that reads like due diligence.
Findings arrive as briefs your in-house team or ours can execute directly, not slides that need translating into work.
A full teardown of the competitive landscape, and exactly what to do about it.
Who actually occupies your target search results, ranked by how much traffic and difficulty each position represents.
Topics and keyword clusters competitors rank for that you don't, mapped to real search intent and volume.
Referring domains linking to competitors but not you, filtered for the ones actually worth pursuing.
Site speed, structure, and crawlability benchmarked against whoever is beating you, not against a generic checklist.
How competitors frame the same offer differently, and where that's earning them clicks or conversions.
Every gap ranked by effort required against traffic and revenue potential, so priority is a decision, not a guess.
A concrete, ordered brief — what to build, what to fix, and what to pursue for links, in sequence.
A shorter follow-up pass so you know if a competitor has moved before it costs you the position.
One to two weeks from kickoff to a plan you can start executing.
Confirm who actually occupies your target SERPs — often different from your commercial competitor set.
Days 1-2Content, backlink, and technical data gathered across every competitor in scope.
Days 2-4Every gap assessed for effort, winnability, and traffic value — not just listed.
Days 5-7Findings turned into an ordered action brief your team or ours can execute directly.
Days 7-9A live session covering the findings and answering the "what about" questions before you commit resources.
Day 10+For teams who need to know exactly what's between them and the rankings they want.
Sites that stopped climbing and can't tell if the cause is their own SEO or a competitor pulling further ahead.
Newer players entering a market where the incumbents' advantage needs to be measured, not assumed.
Teams about to commit budget to SEO who want the plan built on the actual competitive gap, not a template.
White-labeled analysis for teams who need the depth without building the capability in-house.
Companies that just acquired a brand or site and need to understand its real competitive standing fast.
Brands whose competitive set changes by country or language and need that comparison run properly per market.
A fixed-scope report, with an optional recurring check to catch competitors before they pull ahead.
$800-1,400one-off report
Up to 5 competitors, one country and language.
$1,800-3,000one-off report
Multiple countries, languages, or business units compared separately.
$400-700per quarter, optional
A shorter re-check so a competitor's next move doesn't cost you the position.
Exact pricing depends on competitor count and market complexity — quoted precisely after a short scoping call.
Send us your site and the URLs currently outranking you. We'll tell you honestly whether the gap is closeable and roughly what it would take.
One fixed-scope teardown, with a plan you can act on the same week you get it.
Typically 3-5 direct competitors in depth, plus a wider scan of 10-15 to catch anyone gaining ground you have not noticed yet. More than that dilutes the findings rather than sharpening them.
Tools give you a data dump. We read it: which gaps are actually winnable given your resources, which ones are decoys, and what order to close them in. The report you get is a plan, not a spreadsheet.
All three, because they interact. A content gap you can close in a week means nothing if the competitor also has a referring-domain lead that takes a year to match — the plan accounts for that.
Yes, we run the SERP comparison from the same geo and language your customers actually search in, not just a generic national view.
Common, especially when your commercial competitors are not the same as your search competitors. Identifying who actually occupies your target SERPs is the first deliverable, before anything else.
Both are available. Most clients start with a one-off teardown, then add quarterly monitoring once they have acted on the first round of findings.
Yes. Some competitor advantages are not economical to chase — a decade of backlinks from a defunct link-building era, for instance. We say so rather than sell you a campaign against it.
Read access helps calibrate the comparison against your actual traffic and rankings, but is not required — we can run the full analysis from public SERP and backlink data alone.
Yes, it usually does. The gap analysis becomes the starting brief for on-page, content, and link-building work rather than a document that sits unused.
One to two weeks for the standard scope, depending on how many competitors and markets are in play.